🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart nuclear negotiations with Washington as long as it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi said exclusively dialogue was effective, and disclosed fresh requests had been made by mediators to reopen negotiations with the American leadership. He said Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran had not yet reached a point to permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to access bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Navigating a Difficult Course

The foreign minister is walking a difficult path since Iran does not want be perceived to be operating from a position of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more resilient militarily and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to enrich uranium within its borders that it will never give up" – the key factor of the impasse in the previous talks.

Previous Talks Suddenly Ended

The previous five rounds of talks between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter end on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that culminated with the American leader declaring the locations had been obliterated. Subsequently, European countries used their privilege to reimpose international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Offered

Iranian officials said they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to declare success since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been agreed in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Representatives claimed repeatedly they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Present Situation

Iran's diplomats said the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be revived in various formats if negotiations reopen.

Trump in recent days claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Iran's diplomats state they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from the United States either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of inactivity in the face of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran asserts negotiations is not part of a show.

Negotiating Standpoint

In his speech to the conference, designed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the notion of global regulations, the foreign minister stated the 12-day war showed the clash could not be resolved by combat operations. He said the attacks started with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and culminated with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were carried out with full US knowledge and cooperation, making confidence hard to reestablish.

Dialogue Stays the Primary Solution

The foreign minister stated: "Tehran was not the one that had fled diplomacy; it was America and the western countries that had always tried to impose their demands during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be viable and continues the primary answer to settle disagreements, but its criteria, guidelines and tenets must be respected."

"In case they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of respect and honor, they will obtain a reply in the same approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the struggle of recovery and rebuilding, Araghchi claimed he was assured Iran's security strengths "are considerably enhanced than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been restored. We gained numerous insights from this engagement; we have come to know our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He stated: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to eliminate, stays intact. The sites and gear, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is important is the will of the nation of Iran and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but failed to break. The Iranian people have developed stronger, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the leadership and the country in the wake of this invasion."